Home
About Us
Troubled Oceans
Get Involved
Resources
SeaChoice Profiles
News
Recipes
 

Download in: Français


 

Mackerel: King and Spanish
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico
Hook-and-Line, Gill nets

See Report in PDF


Credit/ Wikimedia Commons - Public domain

Best Choice Some Concerns Avoid

SPECIES

Mackerel: King and Spanish

SCIENTIFIC NAME Scomberomorus maculatus; S. cavalla
MARKET NAMES

Cavalla, King, Kingfish, Smoker, Slab, Hog

SUSHI NAMES

Sawara (Spanish Mackerel), Aji (Horse Mackerel), Saba (Atlantic Mackerel)

DESCRIPTION

Spanish and king mackerel are open ocean schooling fishes ranging from the Gulf of Maine to Brazil. Both of these mackerel species migrate seasonally along the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts, moving north in the spring and south in the fall.

Mackerel are a SeaChoice “Best Choice” option as they are resilient to fishing pressure, have healthy stocks, and are well managed. Gear types vary by species and location but generally all have moderate bycatch concerns and low impact to seafloor habitats and broader marine ecosystems.

 

Sustainability Profile
Concern
Low
Moderate
High
Critical
Inherent vulnerability
 x
Status of stocks
 x
Nature of by-catch
 x
Habitat effects
 x
Management effectiveness
 x
INHERENT VULNERABILITY

Spanish and king mackerel are highly fecund (lots of eggs), and both species reach sexual maturity in under five years. Both species have a limited range, being found only in the western Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico. There is no evidence of high population variability driven by environmental change.

STATUS OF STOCKS

Spanish and king mackerel are not overfished. These stocks are considered healthy due to their increasing or stable trends in abundance, and there is no evidence that population structures are skewed. In the Gulf of Mexico however, the king mackerel stock is considered weak as it has just recently recovered from an overfished condition and consequently the stock has not rebuilt.

NATURE OF BY-CATCH

Trends in bycatch quantity and composition have not been documented. At present, there is no evidence suggesting that the fishery is having broad ecosystem impacts.

HABITAT EFFECTS

Both gillnets and hook-and-line gear result in minimal damage to habitat. There is no evidence suggesting that the removal of the target species has or will likely substantially disrupt the food web.

MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS

Management regularly collects both fishery independent and dependent data, has made efforts to reduce bycatch, and enforces fishery regulations. Management has however, set the total allowable catch higher than recommended three times over the last 17 years.

IMPORTANT QUESTION TO ASK

What kind of fish is this?
Where was it caught?
How was it caught?

HEALTH RISKS
View consumption advisories

Consumption advisory due to mercury. + Men should limit intake to less than 1/2 a meal per month + Women and kids under 12 should not eat at all

MSC CERTIFIED

No.

 

 

 

 

Seafood Search | Contact | FAQs | Glossary | Links

Site designed by Brad Hornick